BROWN STANDOFF
| Anti-tax advocates out in force | Couple's trial has attracted their notice |
By Margot Sanger-Katz Monitor staff
January 21. 2007 10:02AM
| David Baker has read the entire internal revenue code. Twice. The Auburn, Mass., man, who drove to Concord several times to attend Ed and Elaine Brown's tax evasion trial, said that he's spent more than 1,000 hours poring over title 26 of the federal code, searching for the provision that requires him to pay taxes. "You will not see a law making anyone liable for these taxes," he said last week in the federal courthouse. Baker was just one of a rotating cast of supporters who filled one side of the visitors' benches in the Browns' courtroom. About a dozen friends and sympathizers came to court each day, whispering commentary during the testimony, and gathering at pulled-together tables for lunchtime strategy sessions at Remy's, the restaurant across from the courthouse. They came from different places, and many did not know each other before the trial began, but most said they were there because they believed the Browns' legal arguments and wanted to help them make their defense. "That's why I'm here," Michael Famolare of Deering said to another supporter early in the trial. "I know I'll have my time." On Thursday, a jury found the Browns guilty of every crime they had been charged with, including tax evasion, conspiracy to defraud the federal government, failing to withhold employment taxes and disguising large financial transactions to avoid reporting requirements. After the verdict came down, Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Morse said he hoped the outcome would send a strong message to those who might adopt the Browns' views. "The arguments they put forth have been routinely dismissed," Morse said yesterday. "The government is going to prosecute people who do not pay their taxes." But in interviews with several court regulars, not one said that his personal beliefs were swayed by the outcome of the trial. Most felt that the Browns were convicted because of unfair trial conditions imposed by the judge, not because their legal position was incorrect. Others said that the Browns were right in their basic view that tax laws are bogus but made tactical mistakes in their courtroom arguments that cost them an acquittal. "This was not a particularly good representation of someone who was educated at defending themselves in a courtroom," said Greg Lidland, who came to court for one day. "But be that as it may, it was also not a good representation of a true and fair trial." For most of the trial, the Browns represented themselves with the help of Michael Avery, a Florida man who runs a service called Outlaws Legal Service. (Judge McAuliffe referred to Avery as their paralegal.) But after neither Brown appeared in court Jan. 12, the couple chose different courses. Elaine Brown returned to court Tuesday and accepted the assistance of a public defender. Ed Brown, who said he distrusts all attorneys, holed up in his Plainfield home and refused to participate in the remainder of the trial. In his rulings on pretrial motions and his statements from the bench, Judge Steven McAuliffe made clear that he agreed with few of the Browns' legal arguments. He said that he believed the Browns' best opportunity for a defense lay in convincing the jury that they honestly misunderstood the tax laws. McAuliffe allowed some discussion of the Browns' tax views into court, but he would not allow the jury to consider the question of whether the tax laws were valid. His rulings prevented the Browns from entering documents into evidence or asking many questions challenging the content and meaning of tax laws. McAuliffe ruled against nearly 40 pretrial motions filed by the Browns, some of which challenged the jurisdiction of the federal court, the legitimacy of the grand jury indictments and the impartiality of the judge, since he's a federal employee. In court filings, the Browns also demanded documents from the government, including evidence of the plaintiff in their criminal case and the home addresses and social security numbers of grand jury members. Many Brown supporters pointed to this paper trail, often erroneously saying that the judge had denied "all 42" motions, as evidence that the trial had been rigged. "You'd think we lived in Somalia or something like that," said Dennis Mounce of Manchester, who said he was distressed by the judge's rulings. "You wouldn't think that would happen in New Hampshire." Several disgruntled trial attendees plan to meet next week to draft a complaint about McAuliffe for the judicial ethics panel. But while the Browns' supporters said they were upset about the trial's outcome, most said that the judge's behavior was what they had expected. "I wanted to see just how the federal courts are in cahoots with the Internal Revenue Service," said Christopher Gronski of Wolfeboro. Gronski is the New Hampshire state coordinator for We The People, a national group that has been challenging the income tax through lawsuits and public confrontations with IRS officials. "I knew the condition of the courts in this country." Gronski also attended to teach a lesson to his 14-year-old daughter, Rebecca. She sat quietly by his side for two days of testimony, wearing a button reading "No, you can't have my rights. I'm still using them." Gronski home schools his children and expects Rebecca to write a report on her experience. "She gets pretty verbal about the injustice that she sees there," he said. Bernie Bastian, a close friend of Ed Brown's, who was in court every day of the trial, said he was upset by the judge's decisions but not surprised. His study of similar trials had shown him that defendants who don't agree with the standard interpretation of the tax code often lose. "I did expect it going in," he said. "I mean, the government doesn't want anyone to know this, so they're bound to suppress all the evidence they can." But Bastian, who said he doesn't pay federal income taxes himself, said the knowledge that he might be prosecuted and convicted for similar crimes doesn't give him pause. "I believe in God and I believe when I get there he's going to be the judge of judges," he said. "If everybody's jumping off a bridge, that's not going to make me." Scott Wells of Concord has been sending letters to the IRS in place of tax returns for several years. He said that he has his doubts about the treatment he'd receive if he was brought into federal court. But he also said that he was dismayed by some of the strategies employed by the Browns. He has his documents in order and his Supreme Court precedents at the ready, he said, should his time come. "I'm not scared," Wells said. "And I don't know if that's just because I'm very confident in my methods or extremely foolish. Time will tell." |
|
MESSAGE FROM ED BROWN From: Ed Brown Date: Feb 1, 2007 10:33 AM
Something very important is going on here. Sure it starts with my tax case but lets look at the big picture here. I am providing a place for us to make a difference, for the people, for this country!
I even offered to pay the taxes just so they would leave me alone, but no,... They took my guns (before ever being convicted of anything) Took my wife and court ordered her away from me. They now want much more money then they say I owe. Want my house. And will again offensively attack me and take my life as well as those around me here now unless we have enough people to make a difference!
We may never have another chance! I need people here Now! Now is the time!
401 Center of Town Road Plainfield, New Hampshire 03781
603-675-2909
(Please repost this far and wide) *******************************************************************ED BROWN MY SPACE URL http://www.myspace.com/time2makeastand ********************************************************** Ed Brown in his Own Words : A "Taxing" Situation (wmv) http://blip.tv/file/135217/ > Source: > Union Leader - Manchester, N.H. > http://www.theunionleader.com/> > Scofflaw 'to nullify' tax plight > http://tinyurl.com/38erdf> > 1/20/07 > > By KRISTEN SENZ > > Plainfield resident Ed Brown, who along with his wife was convicted of > multiple > felony tax evasion charges this week, said yesterday he and a group of > legal > analysts are preparing to take legal action "to nullify the whole > problem." > > "We're working on legal matters and actions," Brown said during a > telephone > interview. "This court is totally off the wall for its actions, and the > record > will show that clearly." > > Believing he would not get a fair trial because, among other reasons, the > federal court and his accuser are the same entity, Brown hasn't left his > house > for about a week and was not in court for the conclusion of his or his > wife's > trial. Dr. Elaine Brown, however, was in court when the verdict was read > Thursday and is now under electronic surveillance at her son's home in > Massachusetts. > > "The jury was rigged before they were there, the jury was rigged before > they > went out, and now my marriage is destroyed," Ed Brown said, clarifying > that > there has been no talk of divorce. > > The Browns argue that there is no law that requires them to pay federal > income > tax and that the federal government has no jurisdiction in New Hampshire. > The > couple does pay local, school and county taxes, Ed Brown said. > > Although rejected by the courts, the Browns' arguments has struck a chord > with > some. Supporters of their cause have gathered at the end of the driveway > that > leads to the Browns' house, a concrete-walled structure that, at least for > now, > doubles as a prison, Brown said. > > "I don't want to hurt anybody, so I'm staying here - right now, but we're > working on that." > > The U.S. Marshal's Office in Concord > www.usmarshals.gov/district/nh/index.html , > has indicated there are no plans to storm Brown's house to arrest him. > > The media attention to the Browns' now high-profile case has sparked the > interest of legal analysts from across the country, Brown said. > > "They're stunned that the judge had the audacity to just dismiss > everything > offhand," he said. "He violated so many due processes it's incredible." > > Brown, a member of the United States Constitution Rangers > www.uscrangers.org , > refused to disclose what type of action he might take, but said his > "mistake" > during the recent court proceedings was filing more than 40 motions in the > case, > all of which were dismissed. > > "We used motions in their court; that's their method and way," he said. > "We > should have used affidavits because the judge has to respond lawfully to > affidavits. That's where we made the mistake. But that's OK; there's still > room. > > "We're going to be working on something pretty soon to nullify the whole > problem," he said. > > Brown, 63, has been convicted of one count of conspiracy to defraud the > federal > government and one count of conspiracy to structure financial > transactions. > > Dr. Brown, 65, has been found guilty of one count of conspiracy to defraud > the > federal government, one count of conspiracy to structure financial > transactions, > five counts of federal income tax evasion, eight counts of failing to > collect > federal payroll taxes for employees in her Lebanon dental office, and two > substantive counts of structuring. > > The Browns each face five years' imprisonment for each of the counts of > conviction, except for the structuring charges, which carry a maximum > penalty of > 10 years. Each conviction also carries a fine of up to $250,000. The U.S. > Attorney's Office said the sentence is likely to be less than the maximum. > > The Browns are both scheduled for sentencing April 24. > > Related articles: > > Couple found guilty > http://tinyurl.com/268kqz> > As trial goes on, he hunkers down > http://tinyurl.com/22fklk> > Tax trial defendants skip court, asking 'What's the point?' > http://tinyurl.com/ytovrw> > 1994 Interview with Ed Brown: Defense Militia Builds NH Base > http://tinyurl.com/26h9lp> > What the IRS says > http://tinyurl.com/2xbygz> > Wife makes a deal; husband digs in > http://tinyurl.com/3b7xde Some ready for a shootout
| | All of a sudden, Ed Brown has a lot of friends | His anti-tax stance attracts wide support |
By Margot Sanger-Katz Monitor staff
January 22. 2007 8:00AM
| Ed Brown parted ways with his wife last week when he decided not to join her for the conclusion of their federal tax evasion trial. But after barricading himself in his fortified Plainfield home and refusing to surrender to authorities, Brown has amassed a new and growing group of friends who support his decision to stand up to government authority. Since Brown and his wife were convicted last week, his case has captured the attention of a variety of fringe groups, including Gandhi-admiring protesters who have limited their involvement to building bonfires and waving signs and armed militia members anxious for confrontation. Some appreciate Brown's stand against the federal income tax, some his pointed criticism of the federal courts, and others his willingness to die for his cause. Whatever their reasons, they've all congregated at the sprawling fortress Brown calls home, turning it into a libertarian carnival with an uncertain ending. "Everybody has their own place on that spectrum," said Dave Ridley of Keene, who has spent several days in Plainfield and positions himself on the nonviolent end. Ridley said he owns a gun but locks it up at home before going to Brown's. "Of course, any group of libertarians has a thousand different opinions." When news of Brown's decision began circulating on talk radio shows and militia-oriented blogs earlier this week, journalists at the Brown homestead outnumbered supporters. As Brown declared that Plainfield might become another Waco, three strangers huddled in his heated garage and emphasized that they had no interest in shooting anyone. But as word has spread and the weekend freed many from workday obligations, the number of those camping at the Brown home has swelled. Estimates were difficult to obtain because supporters were spread throughout the house, sleeping in shifts. And some, Brown said, were hidden outside. But several visitors estimated that the number fluctuated between 15 and 30 this weekend. That group includes one woman who drove an hour to Plainfield and brought Brown a bottle of ginger ale, a carload of young libertarians from Keene and the New York leader of a national anti-tax organization with thousands of members. Brown said he's been moved by the number and enthusiasm of the supporters he's met since deciding to hole up at home. "This situation is exploding so fast in this nation and internationally that the Illuminati around the world are becoming very aware," Brown said, referring to a rumored secret society that he believes has infiltrated the highest levels of the world's governments. Brown and his wife, Elaine, were convicted Thursday of 20 felonies related to the couple's refusal to pay income taxes since 1996. They will be sentenced in April. Elaine Brown, who is cooperating with authorities, has been prohibited from returning to the house. On Friday, the court unsealed a bench warrant for Ed Brown's arrest. Brown said he's prepared to wait as long as it takes. His home, with its solar panels and private well, was designed to function "off the grid." Brown said he has enough food to last several months, and those provisions are replenished daily as supporters come and go, bringing snacks and takeout dinners with them. Despite the threat of looming violence, Brown's kitchen was abuzz with activity yesterday afternoon. Young children built forts from the kindling stacked beside his woodstove. Activists shared newsletters on how to avoid paying property taxes and why it's a bad idea to register to vote. Men munched on Doritos, and women poured their children glasses of orange juice. Rob Jacobs of Allenstown prepared to be sworn into the Constitution Rangers of the Continental Congress of 1777, a group charged with holding law enforcement officials accountable to the Constitution. Over the course of the week, Brown has said repeatedly that he would rather die than submit to federal jurisdiction and that he's readying himself for an armed standoff when the marshals come to arrest him. But U.S. Marshal Stephen Monier has said his office has no intention of beginning a violent confrontation. Monier said that his officers have been communicating regularly with Brown in hopes of reaching a peaceful resolution. Several friends and bloggers have been calling for a bloody conclusion to the situation. William Miller, a friend and fellow Constitution Ranger, sent an e-mail last weekend demanding the hanging of the federal judge and prosecutor who worked on Brown's case - and the martyrdom of Brown himself. "Ed Brown, my friend and mentor, for patriotic reasons, is now worth more to me, and to what I stand for, dead, than alive," Miller wrote. Brown said that Miller has clarified his position with the marshals and that he does not personally endorse any violence toward court officials. But Miller is not the only Brown supporter making violent proclamations. Supporters at Brown's home said the only violence they anticipated was defensive, but several said that they see a shootout as an inevitability. "There's been violence throughout our history, and it's sometimes what it takes to right the wrongs." said Bernie Bastian, a close friend of Brown who has been at his side since the trial ended. "It's a shame that men can't right the wrongs without resorting to it." Other visitors said they were visiting Brown to lend moral support but did not plan to participate in any gun battle. Tim and Marylisa Logsdon spent the weekend at the house with their three young children. Tim Logsdon said he did not feel he was putting his family in any danger. "The building is pretty secure," he said. "And the feds have promised that they won't raid." Brown said he was ambivalent about the prospect of violence. He'd prefer a peaceful resolution, he said, but feels that there are few options available to him. "I would like to see this whole thing go away," he said. "But now's the time it's continuing to build." |
|
(((This is war)))Bob Shultz showed @ Ed Brown's Stand Off in NH>>>www.givemeliberty.org
Your assistance, too, is needed to help assure fair trial in Concord, NH...This opposed to the kangaroo court that's already taken place...Ed & Elaine Brown's sentencing is scheduled for April...Please forward this everywhere & do all else possible before it's too late for recovery in America
If you need media or elected official email addresses contact me and I'll send them...mofmars3@sbcglobal.net & mofmars3@netscape.com...send to both so I'll be sure to see the request, please
This "is" war as you'll see fox news reporting here>>>
http://www.questforfairtrialinconcordnh.blogspot.com/ << Please load your video cameras & stand with Ed & all other patriots now gathering...This could be the ultimate family vacation of all times...Talk about two birds with one stone...Crusading & camping, combined!
All criminal injustices must be stopped now...From perpetual war for benefit of the rich & greedy (Don't forget the Antiwar March on DC, Jan, 27th-google for information) to the war on our own people>>>Income tax is illegal, oppressing and unnecessary with all the many other taxes being collected...Income tax was to last only for the duration of world war II and is voluntary, only
The truth behind income tax>>>Aaron Russo's, "Freedom To Fascism">>>>>>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198 or http://tinyurl.com/ybdb9jUpdate on Ed>>>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070119/ap_on_re_us/tax_evaderNew Hampshire Underground>>>http://www.nhfree.com/If links come apart, paste in browser, carefully closing gaps before clicking ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Invitation to join activists & patriots to help "US" take Back our country>>>
In these dire & dangerous times we must stand together
No matter what group, issue or matter you represent>>>"United We Can Stand" but if we stay divided, we'll fall, for sure...We're all related & connected by our same enemy responsible for all our dilemmas and problems>>>The corrupt who oppress and suppress us all
We are many and there are wayyyy more of us, than them... ********************************************************* Quest for Fair Trial in Concord, NH BLOGBrown Trial Pics, Links + Misc. Imfo Brown Standoff Pics NH UNDERGROUND FORUM ********************************************************** Urgent: Ed Brown has "only just begun to fight!" The ongoing standoff
Posted by: "jsk" jsk@kingcon.com Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:45 pm (PST) Dear friends:
There is much yet to come in the Ed Brown "standoff". I have promised previously that when I had more time I would give you all an update, and so I am.
Ed knows that Jackie and I have taken great risk to film him and get the word out, and that I'm doing so not because I want to self-promote, but co-promote. That is, his situation is giving my book and me more exposure, but the reverse is also true - I have numerous upcoming media events related to my book that were arranged before this situation started, in which I will tie in to Ed's situation, and also Aaron Russo's film.
But there is a much deeper co-promotion going on. Ed was being portrayed in the media as a crazy man. In fact, this morning at a local bank when I mentioned his case the woman there waved her hand and said - that guy's crazy. Well, some sheeple are so afraid of this government that they think anything like free speech is crazy. But moreover, this woman formed her views from watching Channel 3 news last night, which apparently did not present Ed in a flattering light.
And there is an even deeper co-promotion yet, and that is what all you folks are doing. We are all co-promoting, for we represent We the People, not We the Sheeple! Every American has a stake in this matter, whether they see it yet or not. With God's blessings, they will. Thus we are all co-promoting.
The real story here is that the Internet is replacing the media as a reliable source of information, and we have to get that story out, to convert more sheeple to patriots. Ed knows I hold religious beliefs which prohibit my taking guns to his home over money, and that if the government came to me for money then I would give them whatever they wanted. No offense to those who feel differently - this is a debate for another day. But Ed also knows I respect his freedom to choose his own faith, and his own death, and that's why he respects my view. I am well armed for my family's defense, but in this fight my weapon is the pen. Ed feels God brought us together to do this thing, and we don't fully understand God's plan, but we trust Him and are filled with joy to be humbly entrusted with this task. But many of you are also part of this plan, and you know it! Thus we are all co-promoting, brothers and sisters..Let us not be divided over little things, or over means.
You must all spread Ed's story and the press coverage, because that is the real story. Ed trusts me to carry his message, but he is trusting you also. My life and family are in jeopardy also, and so I too am trusting you. Please don't let this flame die.
The national media are cooling on this story, presumably because the government does not want the kind of flashpoint attention that Ed is now receiving. But we must not let it cool. This will soon be a news story not about Ed, but about a referendum on an overly powerful federal government which has already swept away our constitutional rights, and which has evil plans in store for us. This must be what unites us all in a cause much greater than a rich guy in New Hampshire with a gun, or a poor couple from Vermont with a camera. Make no mistake - I more than most of you am keenly aware of how grave Ed's situation is, and that he is likely to be killed. It is because of that gravity that I know also that the best way to prolong or save Ed's life is to humanize him before they kill him, not afterwards, when he can no longer speak or draw attention to his (our) cause.
Over the weekend I told Ed I'd be coming on Tuesday to visit again, though I was actually planning to visit on Monday, which we did. Jackie and I filmed Ed for several hours, including all of the footage taken by Channel 3. We interviewed that reporter: when he arrived, he told me he was very nervous. I said "Do you have a gun?" Shocked, he exclaimed "No!" I said "Then you have absolutely no reason to be afraid". After he interviewed Ed, I interviewed him, and asked him whether he feared Ed. Completely relaxed, he answered honestly "No, and it's been a long time since I've seen two gun. We also filmed Ed's complete conversation with his wife Elaine when she called to tell him she had been informed that the big guys were on their way from Washington, D.C. We then filmed Ed as he called many of you, including his call to Rick Stanley.
I've heard some express that they were afraid to go to Ed's home. Fear of the federal government is what gives that government power. I had no fear at all, nor did my wife, for if this is God's plan for our deaths, so be it. If you don't want to bring a gun (which would likely be aiding and abetting under federal law: whether "legal" or not), then how can you possibly be so cowardly as to not go without one? This is a chance to look in the mirror, and for such people to consider where they will stand when the real fireworks begin, probably sometime soon. Such fear has no place in this, and will not serve anything but to enslave you. Imagine how our founding fathers felt, with no health or homeowners' insurance, and when if they were killed their wives and children often could not run the farm, etc, without them. We the People do not fear our servant government: it is this runaway government which must fear the wrath of an awakened We the People.
And speaking of colonial times, consider how our forefathers advanced their cause - on horseback, with wax-stamped envelopes and printing presses that printed one page at a time. Thomas Paine printed his first pamphlet (Common Sense, I believe) with his own money: he was a model for my own endeavor, which I similarly printed for people to read with my own money. And now I'm so broke I am borrowing money to work on this project. I'm not complaining - Ed's willing to risk everything he has, and I already risked it, with joy. For we both know that money will not protect us from tyranny, and that we will just lose everything anyway if we don't stand now. To paraphrase the New Testament (the book of John): he who tries to save his money will lose it. Soon the full meaning of that Scriptural gift will be tested - He who tries to save his own life will lose it. Without God we have nothing, so what are we willing to give back? As with our government, who is the servant and who is the master? God is my guide, and it is He who I trust and fear (respect, in awe).
So Jackie and I are walking this walk, with Ed and with all of you. We have about six hours of video of Ed Brown the man, and what he stands for. Do you want to see it? The station that allowed me to use their camera is not willing to be further involved, for good reason and not cowardice: I must not ask them to go beyond what their legal purposes are, or many jobs and a truly independent news medium will possibly be jeopardized. I fully respect this. I have hidden the tapes securely, but the government does not want them out. I mean, believe me, the government really does not want them out! Now who amongst you will stand with me and Jackie, with the power of the pen, to carry this further? Will we stand alone and go down without the public seeing these videos? Imagine if the Weavers had been filmed through their ordeal.. Ed is not even charged with violent crime, or with gun violations. No one from the government has been shot at, let alone killed. Don't you think they will come for me soon? I only fear that my work will be left unfinished - I fear nothing else, for this is my task, and my wife (God bless her and protect her!) shares this passion. You see, if we get more of this out, we may be able to save Ed's life, and he knows this. He wouldn't talk with me about strategy to do this. He just kept saying: "Naw, that's your thing. I'm doing my thing! People don't seem to understand - I'm all right with the Father." But it's not just about saving Ed's life, or my and my family's freedom from the threat of prison - it's about your lives, and the sheeple's lives. Many of us know this. Rick Stanley takes enormous risk advising people to bring arms in peaceful defense to N.H. Don't you think he and his wife are aware of the risks, after all he's been through? Rick and I differ on some points (because I haven't had time yet to straighten him out! :-)), but we are brothers in mutual respect who will follow our own paths
I've sent a plea to the guys and gals at Loose Change, and am awaiting a response. Perhaps you folks will e-mail or phone them (publicity@loosechan ge911.com; phone # (607) 267-4456) or both, and encourage them to at least let me bring them the film and encode it before it's lost, taken or damaged. I await their call anxiously, so that I may complete my task. You can fire off e-mails even if you don't fire guns, can't you? Do you want to see what Ed Brown has to say about torture and depleted uranium, about George W. Bush and the use of the U.S. Military against American civilians? Ed studies the law - he's got a more complete law library than most lawyers. He knows that the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act of 2007, passed with the cowardly assistance of "our" Democrats in Congress, allows George W. Bush to send National Guard troops from anywhere in the country to N.H. without state consent, to assault people like Ed and those who are there with him. Do you want to hear him say so, so that his voice will carry to others, even the sheeple? For this government has not passed these laws with no intention of using them, my countrymen! Look it up on the government's web site: www.senate.gov <http://www.senate. gov/> . This is our right, isn't it, Americans? To look at the laws and talk about them? They snuck these and other laws into massive military spending bills so we wouldn't notice, and they are counting on the sheeple staying dumb. But Ed noticed, and I noticed, and you have noticed. How shall we spread the word? What if Paul Revere had owned a laptop?
Arise, We the People! Don't let this be another tale about the past, unless it is a glorious one! I am poor in wealth and in health, and I give my widow's two cents to you now. I'm not a member of many groups, I'm limited in time (and technical competence), and I need help NOW! Ride, Paul Reveres: it's not just a story anymore. It's the modern revolution. If Loose Change declines my approach, who out there will help me? I have guns, all unloaded, for I will not resist, or otherwise give this government cause to discredit me and thus you. Ed and Jackie and I are at the Alamo. (Remember the Alamo? :-)). I'm only afraid of my own potential for failure, but I know that you, and God, will not fail me.
Just help me get out Ed's story, would you, countrymen? Where are We the People?
Your humble servant, watching at the wall, in Christ,
John Klar www.christianwords. us <http://www.christia nwords.us/> jsk@kingcon. com revpress@kingcon. com
<http://www.archive. org/download/ Ed_Brown_ Interview_ IRS_Standoff/ klarBrown. m pg> http://www.archive. org/download/ Ed_Brown_ Interview_ IRS_Standoff/ klarBrown Ed Brown Musical Tribute http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQa-m86Uytc Standoff Update Jan 25th Ed Brown Is Only A Symptom Launch Ed Brown's Webchat Straight Talk with Ed Brown 02-03-07 Ed Brown - Show me the Law and Ill pay! (with Eminem) Ed Brown Audio's Ed Brown Video's *********************************************************************** > I can't thank everyone enough for your concern. Elaine Brown is my > mother, but that aside I can assure you and the world she is no > criminal. Her only crime is knowing too much. Even if her > questioning of the IRS was a crime, why does our government feel it > should be a criminal offense worthy of incarceration while the > murderers, rapists, and repeat DUI offenders are still walking the > streets? > > Over and over, they have been denied a fair trial as guaranteed by > the US Constitution. Every motion filed has been denied, they have > not been allowed witnesses or allowed to submit evidence. Judge > Steven McAuliffe (widower of Christa McAuliffe) has a serious God > complex and only his word reigns in his courtroom. He doesn't even > allow the citation of case law, the most essential part of courtroom > proceedings! > > Elaine is a loving mother, compassionate friend, talented doctor, > intelligent, and generous to a fault. She does not deserve one day > in prison for questioning the government. For ten years she wrote > to the IRS requesting an explaination of the tax law which applied > to her and Ed, and never once received a response. Rather, the IRS > just sat on all her letters, waiting a decade, and raided her home > and office. > > Please help our family in this desparate hour. Your support could > very well save the life of my mother and her husband Ed. I may very > well see many of you tonight or tomorrow if the idiots from Concord > don't come to their senses. > > Again, my heartfelt gratitude to all of you. > > -David Hatch *************************************************************************** We received this from A.P.:
I just wanted to take the time to let everyone know where Ed and Elaine Brown are and where you could write to them. Every letter helps to cheer them up a little. They don't deserve to be there, the least we can do, is make them smile once in awhile by our kind and loving words. Please pass this onto other, that they may write them as well.
THANKS,
ELAINE BROWN 03924-049 FMC CARSWELL FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER P.O. BOX 27137 FORT WORTH, TX 76127
EDWARD BROWN 03923-049 USP MARION U.S. PENITENTIARY P.O. BOX 1000 MARION, IL 62959
Please take a few minutes and let them know we have not forgotten them! Now count your blessings and thank God there are people like them to take the lead.
I have also included another great lady that should not be forgotten.
SHERRY P JACKSON 59085-019 FCI COLEMAN MEDIUM FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P.O. BOX 1032 COLEMAN, FL 33521 ********************************************************** Cancer news from Johns Hopkins?Hospital My wife went through breast cancer in April two years ago. This is the same thing her oncologist told her.??It is a good summary, so I will pass it on. Cancer updates -- Johns Hopkins -- Cancer News from Johns Hopkins: 1.????? No plastic containers in micro. 2.????? No water bottles in freezer. 3.????? No plastic wrap in microwave. ? Johns Hopkins has recently sent this out in its newsletters. This information is being circulated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well. Dioxin chemicals cause cancer, especially breast cancer. Dioxins are highly poisonous to the cells of our bodies. Don't freeze your plastic bottles with water in them as this releases dioxins from the plastic. Recently, Dr. Edward Fujimoto, Wellness Program Manager at Castle Hospital, was on a TV program to explain this health hazard. He talked about dioxins and how bad they are for us. He said that we should not be heating our food in the microwave using plastic containers. This especially applies to foods that contain fat. He said that the combination of fat, high heat, and plastics releases dioxin into the food and ultimately into Instead, he recommends using glass, such as Corning Ware, Pyrex or ceramic containers for heating food. You get the same results, only without the dioxin. So such things as frozen dinners, instant raman noodles and soups, etc., should be removed from the container and heated in something else. ? Paper isn't bad but you don't know what is in the paper. It's just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware, etc. He reminded us that a while ago some of the fast food restaurants moved away from the foam containers to paper. The dioxin problem is one of the reasons. Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran, is just as dangerous when placed over?foods to be cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of the plastic wrap and drip into the food. ? Cover food with a paper towel instead. This is an article that should be sent to anyone important in your life *************************************** This is what happens when you have dirt on the Clintons :
1 - James McDougal - Clinton 's convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr's investigation.
2 - Mary Mahoney - A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown . The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
3 - Vince Foster - Former white House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock 's Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
4 - Ron Brown - Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown's skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.
5 - C. Victor Raiser II and Montgomery Raiser, Major players in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.
6 - Paul Tulley - Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock, September 1992... Described by Clinton as a "Dear friend and trusted advisor"
7- Ed Willey - Clinton fund raiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.
8 - Jerry Parks - Head of Clinton's gubernatorial security team in Little Rock . Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock . Park's son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton . He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.
9 - James Bunch - Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a "Black Book" of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas .
10 - James Wilson - Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater. 11- Kathy Ferguson, ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.
12 - Bill Shelton - Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.
13 - Gandy Baugh - Attorney for Clinton 's friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.
14 - Florence Martin - Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.
15 - Suzanne Coleman - Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.
16 - Paula Grober - Clinton 's speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.
17 - Danny Casolaro - Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.
18 - Paul Wilcher - Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 "October Surprise" was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993 in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno three weeks before his death.
19 - Jon Parnell Walker - Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington , Virginia apartment balcony August15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guarantee scandal.
20 - Barbara Wise - Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.
21- Charles Meissner - Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.
22 - Dr. Stan ley Heard - Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee, died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton 's advisory council personally treated Clinton 's mother, stepfather and brother.
23 - Barry Seal - Drug running pilot out of Mena Arkansas , death was no accident.
24 - Johnny Lawhorn Jr. - Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.
25 - Stan ley Huggins - Investigated Madison Guarantee. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released. 26- Hershell Friday - Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1, 1994 when his plane exploded
27 - Kevin Ives and Don Henry - Known as "The boys on the track" case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the two boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.
THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:
28 - Keith Coney - Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, July 1988.
29 - Keith McMaskle - Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988
30 - Gregory Collins - Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
31 - Jeff Rhodes - He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
33 - James Milan - Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to "natural causes."
34 - Jordan Kettleson - Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.
35 - Richard Winters - A suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD: 36 - Major William S. Barkley Jr. 37 - Captain Scott J. Reynolds 38 - Sgt. Brian Hanley 39 - Sgt. Tim Sabel 40 - Major General William Robert son 41 - Col. William Densberger 42 - Col. Robert Kelly 43 - Spec. Gary Rhodes 44 - Steve Willis 45 - Robert Williams 46 - Conway LeBleu 47 - Todd McKeehan Quite an impressive list! Pass this on. Let the public become aware of what happens to anyone who might damage the Clinton machine! ***************************************** Who Owns You? Government's own documents, treaties, and laws says so!
1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Internatinal Monetary Fund), (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)
3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg.113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)
5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of operating under bankruptcy its finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the creditors or share holders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C. 914
6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)
7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites above)
8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103-826)
11. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System. *
12. The UN is a One World Super Government. *
13. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations. *
14. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)
15. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.)
16. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the top left United States Treasury.)
17. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
18. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502)
19. The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24)
20. The King of England [THE ROTHSCHILDS] financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
21. You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
22. America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)
23. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213) [????]
24. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54) [????]
25. A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209)
26. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
27. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
28. The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44) [????]
29. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children. (Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
30. Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg 99. Websters 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.)
31. "The People" does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243)
32. The United States Government was not founded upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.) [CORRECT. BUT UNDER THE OVERSIGHT OF A SUPREME BEING]
33. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.
34. Everything in the "United States" is For Sale: roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water, prisons airports etc. I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to check? (Executive Order 12803)
35. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037)
36. The UN has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years and now owns every man, women and child in America. [COME AND TAKE ME!] The UN also holds all of the Land in America in Fee Simple. *
37. The good news is we don't have to fulfill "our" fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another's fictitious obligation. *
38. The depression and World War II were a total farce. The United States and various other companies were making loans to others all over the World during the Depression. The building of Germanys infrastructure in the 1930's including the Railroads was financed by the United States. That way those who call themselves "Kings," "Prime Ministers," and "Fuher,"etc could sit back and play a game of chess using real people. Think of all of the Americans, Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were defending their Countries which didn't even exist. The millions of innocent people who died for nothing. Isn't it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in these fiascoes? That is where the "Bank of International Settlements" is located. Wars are manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have to have an enemy to keep the illusion of "Government" in place. *
39. The "United States" [THE CORPORATION] did not declare Independence from Great Britain or King George. *
40. Guess who owns the UN?
* Caveat Redemptor - Verify for yourself |
************************************************Poll: Bush 'bigger villain' than Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein 28 Dec 2006 When people were asked in an AP-AOL News poll to name the villains and heroes of the year, Bush topped both lists, in a sign of these polarized times. Bush won the villain sweepstakes by a landslide, with one in four respondents putting him at the top of that bad-guy list. When people were asked to name the candidate for villain that first came to mind, Bush far outdistanced even Osama bin Laden, the terrorist leader in hiding; and former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who is scheduled for execution.********************************************************************************************* Source: http://www.holisticmed.com/splenda/splenda-adverse.txt
Sucralose Toxicity Information Center http://www.HolisticMed.com/splenda/
Sucralose / Splenda Toxicity Reaction Samples ---------------------------------------------
This document contains a sampling of Splenda (sucralose) adverse reactions forwarded to the Sucralose Toxicity Information Center and posted to public online discussion groups. The names have been removed to protect confidentiality, but many of these posts can be found in various archives and WWW search engines. Please note that this document is only a tiny percentage of adverse reactions to sucralose that have been posted to the Internet over the last few years. The toxicity reactions posted to the Internet are only a very small percentage of the total toxicity reactions reported to various groups.
If you have experienced health damage from sucralose / Splenda and your health improved after removing it from your diet, please forward your toxicity reaction to:
Mark D. Gold Splenda Toxicity Information Center 12 East Side Dr., Suite 2-18 Concord, NH 03301 mgold@holisticmed.com
-------------------------
Subject: Splenda/sucralose
I just wanted to share my experience with Splenda. I've never been a religious user of artificial sweetners because of the after taste. Splenda was a welcome replacement for sugar because I couldn't taste the difference.
I started using it in the morning in my green tea and in my yogurt. After a couple of days I felt like I was coming down with the flu. I didn't make the connection for about a week. I stopped using the Splenda and within 24 hours I started feeling better. A month or so later I picked up a couple of Atkins bars at the health food store since they were on sale. I didn't even think to read the label. I ate one a work when I got back and all was fine unitl the following morning when I woke up feeling fluish. The symptoms lasted all day. I haven't used Splenda since, or so I thought. I've always been a gum chewer and about 6 months ago I came across the Altoids -sugar free gum at Trader Joes. I really liked the punch of flavor and it became my gum of choice. I noticed the quantity of gum I was purchasing each week started to increase. I guess I was up to about 10-15 pieces a day. The beginning of May I started having aching joints in my hands. I first thought it was due to my new water arobics program but after 6 weeks it just seemed to worsen and I noticed that my hands are swollen every morning and exercising makes it worse. I also noticed that my legs would ache when I go for a run in the morning and so I started walking instead. My legs weren't really aching anymore but I am very concience of them, if that makes sense. I generally feel tired and unrested so I have to force myself to exercise.
I made an appointment with my Dr, but was unable to get in for 3 weeks. My appointment was this morning and she fees all the symptoms are leading to arthritis. The next step is the lab work. It dawned on me this morning that maybe it's the gum. I looked up sucralose on the internet and it's Splenda, which I new I was sensitive to. As of today, I've given up the sugar free gum... hopefully the joint aching in my hands go away FOREVER. I will continue on the path the Dr has started.... just in case.
Tucson, AZ
----------------
[Note: Both aspartame and Splenda discussed in below reaction.]
Subject: aspartame
Dear Dr. Martini,
I read the article in the New York Times about aspartame and just wanted to pass on our experience (my husband Tom and mine) with you.
Tom was diagnosed with stage 2 diabetes years ago and immediately became a diet soda junkie. He not only drank diet soda Coke and Pepsi morning,noon, and night he even took it to work with him in a cooler so it would be cheaper for him. Never in a million years would we have guessed what our life would end up being . We thought he was doing the right thing by drinking the diet Pepsi and taking care of his diabetes We were wrong. When Tom reached 58 he started having problems : couldn't remember the bank card number so it would get taken, headaches, etc. We went to the doctors and we were told he was getting older (58) not to worry. Well I pushed for a new doctor and when they finally took an MRI he had a LARGE GBM stage 4 tumor growing on the left side of his brain. He was operated on October 18, and given 4 months to live. We are now working on year #4. My son insisted we take him off aspartame at once and Tom has never had diet anything from that day. It has been the only change we made in his diet until 2 years ago. Tom had seizures after the operation and the doctors were sure it was from the operation HOWEVER I was allowing Tom to have Splenda (Blue Bunnie ice cream) he loved his ice cream and Blue Bunnie didn't have the aspartame. What I failed to realize was he was having the seizures with it. I did not connect the two until we went to a diet clenic for his sugar and Splenda was told to be the new great sweetener. I called Splenda number on their box before giving it to him. Tom was on Keppra seizure medication by now and I wanted to make sure Splenda was fine. The splenda people said if he had had Blue Bonnie ice cream he could have Splenda with no problem. I gave Tom Splenda packs for his coffee and within 3 days (on Keppra) Tom was having seizures. I called his neurologist and was told to get him off Splenda immediately and as of that day Tom has not had a seizure. I called Splenda again and reported it and asked them why they were not informing the public their reply was - " We know it caused seizures and migraines BUT not enough people had called in YET." Please let me know if we can be of any help to you we know the dangers and are living our days, one day at a time.
Ps. The surgeon did say he thought the tumor had been there 2 and 1/2 years.
-----------------
Subject: Splenda reaction
A month later, I bought a 12-pack of Diet Coke with Splenda. (I generally drink one - and only one - Diet Coke per day.) I found myself with stomach upset and diarrhea several hours after drinking the Coke. I decided to stop drinking the Coke, and I had no more diarrhea. To test the reaction, a week later I drank another Diet Coke with Splenda. Within hours, the diarrhea and stomach upset had returned.
I called Coca Cola Company to complain. They said that no one had EVER complained of such a reaction, and that Splenda was completely safe. They did advise me to take the remaining product back to the store for a refund.
Several weeks later, I ate some Breyer's Lite Ice Cream and had the exact same reaction. When I examined the label, I found that Splenda was an ingredient. I called the manufacturer and again was told that no one else had ever complained about Splenda and that it was completely safe.
After these events, I remembered having diarrhea after a football game where I had consumed two bottles of a flavored carbonated water. Sure enough, when I looked at the label of another bottle, it contained Splenda.
I am now steering clear of all sucralose products, and now that I have read your website, I will also stay away from Aspartame!
-----------------
Subject: Splenda Splenda makes me very sick. I have tried it several times in different products and it gives me terrible gastric distress. Cramping and gas. I have to read the small print in everything now since they are using it so much.
-------------------
Re: Splenda and Aspartame
I recently have started using Splenda. I am consuming a normal a normal amount. Well now I have stopped because since I have been using it I am very short of breath and am breaking out in hives all over my body. I researched this online and many people have the same thing happening to them after eating splenda. So I am allergic to it, but personally unless you are diabetic you shouldn't really eat artificial sweeteners like splenda because its not healthy. I mean who knows..in a few years doctors will find out that splenda causes some disease or something. Its a bit far - fetched but who knows.
------------------
Hi
I started using endulge atkins bars about 2 weeks ago, I loved them so much I was eating up to 3 a day!
After 4 days I noticed a rash on my chest which became very itchy, the next day the rash and welts had spread to my back, the top of my arms, my neck and the top of my legs and hands. It was extremely itchy especially during the night. I went to the doctor who gave me a cream containing hydrocortisone and a tablet once a day.
It has been 3 days since, and I am still itchy, but the welts are going down very slowly. I read the ingredients in my endulge bars which are sweetned by Splenda.
In the past I had splenda and stopped as it made me sad, upset and angry, I was getting like this this time but had no idea Splenda was in the Endulge bars.
I am hoping the rash wil go by Wednesday as I am an actress and have an important casting..If not, what do you reckon the chances are of Splenda re-embursing my loss in wages.
Even my face has welts on it and I feel like a lepor.
Thanks for this information and I hope anyone else who suffers the same realises it's splenda
----------------
Subject: Splenda
Hi, A few years ago, roughly the same time I began using Splenda, I developed frequent and dramatic skin rashes on my hands. I've deduced that excluding city water from my diet dramatically decreases the outbreaks. However, with no city water intake, I do still get the outbreaks. Having heard that Splenda is a chlorinated product (I suspect the chlorine in the city water was the culprit there) I believe there may be a connection between the beginning of my Splenda use and the onset of the hand rashes. Here are my questions: Have you heard of any similar symptoms in regard to Splenda? Do any of you know how I can get in touch with the Splenda class-action case attorneys?
-------------
Sucralose??? About a month ago I started using a diet soda containing sucralose. Within a week I developed leg aches. The leg aches became pain and weakness. I also became slightly nauseous and had a mild headache. My appetite diminished and I have lost 5 pounds, (I'm not complaining about the weight loss). I stopped using the product two days ago and the leg pain is beginning to subside. I'm not sure if this is just coincidence or a reaction to the sucralose. Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks!
----------------
Splenda? Used it and lived to regret it. Please, as a favor to yourself... check the 'Net for Splenda articles. I can't remember the site, but the short term studies don't look good, and the horror stories are truly scary! I may be pregnant, but when I used Splenda, or any other sucralose-infused product, I swelled up to the point where my circulation was dangerously inhibited, I became lightheaded, and my blood pressure dropped. After running across the Splenda stories on advice from a former teacher of mine, I stopped using Splenda, and experienced an immediate cessation in symptoms. There are some who have actually gone into anaphelactic shock after using the product.
Now, Stevia is great, seriously, if you don't mind the expense, and no known (currently) side effects.******************************************************************************************** If there were a contest for the best example of total disregard for human life the victor would be McNeil Nutritionals - makers of SplendaTM. Manufacturers of VioxxTM and LipitorTM would tie for a very distant second.
McNeil Nutritionals is the undisputed drug-pushing champion for disguising their drug SplendaTM as a sweetener. Regardless of its drug qualities and potential for side-effects, McNeil is dead set on putting it on every kitchen table in America. Apparently, VioxxTM and LipitorTM makers can't stoop so low as to deceptively masquerade their drug as a candy of sort. There is no question that their products are drugs and by definition come with negative side- effects. Rather than sell directly to the consumer, these losers have to go through the painful process of using doctors to prescribe their dangerous goods.
A keen student in corporate drug dealing, McNeil learned from aspartame and saccharine pushers that if a drug tastes sweet then let the masses eat it in their cake. First though, you have to create a facade of natural health. They did this using a cute trade name that kind of sounds like splendid and packaged it in pretty colors. Hypnotized, the masses were duped instantly. As unquestionably as a dog humps your leg, millions of diabetics (and non-diabetics) blindly eat sucralose under the trade name SplendaTM in place of real sugar (sucrose).
SplendaTM was strategically released on April fools day in 1998. This day is reserved worldwide for hoaxes and practical jokes on friends and family, the aim of which is to embarrass the gullible. McNeil certainly succeeded.
The splendid SplendaTM hoax is costing gullible Americans $187 million annually. (1) While many people "wonder" about the safety of SplendaTM they rarely question it. Despite its' many "unknowns" and inherent dangers, SplendaTM demand has grown faster than its supply. No longer do I have to question my faith in fellow Man. He is not a total idiot, just a gullible one. McNeil jokesters are laughing all the way to the bank.
Splenda is not as harmless as McNeil wants you to believe. A mixture of sucralose, maltodextrine and dextrose (a detrimental simple sugar), each of the not-so-splendid SplendaTM ingredients has downfalls. Aside from the fact that it really isn't "sugar and calorie free," here is one big reason to avoid the deceitful mix...Think April fools day:
SplendaTM contains a potential poison
SplendaTM contains the drug sucralose. This chemical is 600 times sweeter than sugar. To make sucralose, chlorine is used. Chlorine has a split personality. It can be harmless or it can be life threatening.
In combo with sodium, chlorine forms a harmless "ionic bond" to yield table salt. Sucralose makers often highlight this worthless fact to defend its' safety. Apparently, they missed the second day of Chemistry 101 - the day they teach "covalent" bonds.
When used with carbon, the chlorine atom in sucralose forms a "covalent" bond. The end result is the historically deadly "organochlorine" or simply: a Really-Nasty Form of Chlorine (RNFOC).
Unlike ionic bonds, covalently bound chlorines are a big no-no for the human body. They yield insecticides, pesticides, and herbicides - not something you want in the lunch box of your precious child. It's therefore no surprise that the originators of sucralose, chemists Hough and Phadnis, were attempting to design new insecticides when they discovered it! It wasn't until the young Phadnis accidentally tasted his new "insecticide" that he learned it was sweet. And because sugars are more profitable than insecticides, the whole insecticide idea got canned and a new sweetener called Splenda got packaged.
To hide its' origin, SplendaTM pushers assert that sucralose is "made from sugar so it tastes like sugar." Sucralose is as close to sugar as WindexTM is to ocean water.
The RNFOC poses a real and present danger to all SplendaTM users. It is risky because the RNFOC confers a molecule with a set of super powers that wreak havoc on the human body. For example, Agent Orange, used in the U.S Army's herbicidal warfare program, is a RNFOC. Exposure can lead to Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-Hodgkins lymphoma as well as diabetes and various forms of cancer! Other shocking examples are the war gas phosgene, chlordane and lindane. (2) The RNFOC is lethal because it allows poisons to be fat soluble while rendering the natural defense mechanisms of the body helpless.
A poison that is fat soluble is akin to a bomb exploding internally. It invades every nook and cranny of the body. Cell walls and DNA - the genetic map of human life - become nothing more than potential casualties of war when exposed. Sucralose is only 25% water soluble. (3) Which means a vast majority of it may explode internally. In general, this results in weakened immune function, irregular heart beat, agitation, shortness of breath, skin rashes, headaches, liver and kidney damage, birth defects, cancer, cancer and more cancer - for generations! (1)
McNeil asserts that their studies prove it to be safe for everyone, even children. That's little assurance. Learning from the VioxxTM debacle (and many others highlighted in my book Health Myths Exposed) which killed tens of thousands, we know that studies can be bought and results fabricated.
Some things are worth dying for. Splenda is not one of them. What people think of as a food is a drug or slow poison - little distinction there. It wouldn't be wise to bet your health on it. If safe, sucralose would be the first molecule in human history that contained a RNFOC fit for human consumption. This fact alone makes sucralose questionable for use as a sweetener, if not instantly detrimental to our health. Only time will tell. Until then, Ill stick to the safe and naturally occurring stevia plant to satisfy my occasional sweet tooth in 2007.
Be forewarned though, as long as drugs can be legally disguised as sweeteners, watch out for drugs being disguised as vitamins...Oh wait, they are already doing that - think Lipitor. **********************************************************
Got an Ant Problem? Use Aspartame aka anything-but-sugar Nutra-sweet
For all the dire health problems associated with aspartame -- the worst of them being cancer -- the original "anything-but-sugar" substitute may have an ideal purpose to exist, not as a food additive, but as an ant poison Already aware of aspartame's origins as a toxic chemical, a health-conscious consumer with an ant problem emptied one packet of aspartame in the corner of each of her bathrooms two years ago. The "sweet" solution worked brilliantly, as she's seen no signs of carpenter ants crawling around for the past year. Aspartame may be just the thing for getting rid of fire ants (impervious to many poisons) too, although this solution takes a bit more effort. Initially, fire ants ignored their aspartame treat until a light rain moistened it. After the rain, however, the fire ants came back with a vengeance, taking the aspartame back to the mound by the hundreds. Within two days, any evidence?that fire ants existed at all, save for an empty mound, vanished. No mystery aspartame works like a pesticide, as the asparctic acid contained in this toxic product is a well-documented excitotoxin that causes specific brain cells to become excessively excited to the point they quickly die, just as both kinds of ants did. Makes you wonder if aspartame is a far safer, better alternative to getting rid of lawn and home pests than the average toxic pesticides found at your neighborhood hardware store ... If you ever wanted a painless way to find out all the dangers of aspartame you will certainly want to view Sweet Misery. If you are a natural health care practitioner you might want to consider showing this in your reception area.
********************************************************************************************** POLONIUM 210 ADDITIVE TOBACCO PRODUCTS SINCE 1944 In early December, 2006, the news was filled with the stories regarding the poisoning of a Russian spy, Alexander Litvinenko, who was living in London, England. The poison ingested by this man was the radioactive polonium-210, which is the deadliest substance known to man. I have studied and worked with the chemistry for years, so when I heard about the polonium-210 problem, I immediately saw the grave danger of its use as a terrorist weapon. Polonium-210 is an alpha-emitter, which is found in trace amounts in pitchblende, or it can be produced from radon gas. It is also made by bombarding bismuth in a cyclotron and breeder reactor such as Hanford Site in the early 1940's for purposes of using the production of alpha particles, protons and neutrons, to establish critical mass to trigger atomic weapons. Polonium-210 is one trillion times more deadly than hydrogen cyanide, Zyklon B of Auschwitz gas chambers, as the human body can only tolerate a maximum of 7 picograms (7x10 to the 23rd power in grams). The alpha rays only travel a few inches, but if ingested, or delivered as a gas to the body, polonium-210 immediately attacks the DNA throughout the body, not only the organ of entry and causes cancer of the organ of entry such as the lungs, or any other organ permeated by the polonium-210. It also begins to break down the compounds of the body into original elements. In other words, your body begins to return to the dusty of the earth from whence it came while you are still alive, and you are unaware of the radioactive fallout inside until it is too late. By the time it is diagnosed by physicians with the secondary disease rather than the primary etiology of Polonium-210 poisoning. Oddly enough, polonium-210 had been used in the textile industry as a static absorber. The case of the high profile Litvinenko poisoning was done as a test, possibly. (1)Amounts of it were found everywhere that Litvinenko had been. It can be left behind from saliva, sweat, and other body fluids, and exhaled into the ambient air supply to be available to gas the recipients in the same room or car. The substance has a half-life of 138 days, which means that to be completely clear of even one dose takes a person approximately 7 years before the liver and kidneys are no longer radioactive. We have learned that BRITISH AIRWAYS has issued a warning to 33,000 passengers that they may have been exposed to polonium-210, because contamination was found in airliners that traveled from Moscow to London between October 25th and November 3rd, 2006. (2) We have also learned that this poisoned Russian spy was reportedly a recent convert to Islam, and he was believed to have planned the sale of polonium-210 to Islamic terrorists. (3) In the year 2001 the world-wide annual production of polonium-210 was a minuscule 100 grams. Now it can be purchased in trace amounts on the internet for $ 69.00 per sample. (4) POLONIUM-210 ADDITIVE TO TOBACCO It has been well known described that Polonium-210 is a clear additive to tobacco products and has been since 1944. We are just now seeing the massive increases in cancer diagnoses as a result of this Polonium-210 poisoning both in the people that have used tobacco products and have been gassing themselves with it daily for years, and those in the immediate proximity, who have been gassed by the radioactive fallout as a result. The PARLIAMENT OF ENGLAND convened a special session to specifically isolate this as a "rare and isolated incident" and not publicly utilized, to prevent the spreading of the word that tobacco have been gassing the public through routine use of the taxed products of tobacco to reduce all entitlements by $ Trillions of dollars globally. The government wants to promote this as a simple taste matter, and thus calls the gassing, "smoking" aligned with ham, beef brisket, bacon, and turkey. Gassing is a word associated with WWI and the mustard gas of the war time period and is never used in connection with tobacco, to reveal its true purpose and intent by the produces of the Polonium-210 tainted products. *************************************************************************************************************************************
|